Do I Have A Medical Malpractice-Wrongful Death Case?

The scope of the medical malpractice problem. differ drastically on the number of medical mistakes that happen in the United States. Some studies position the variety of medical errors in excess of one million yearly while other research studies place the number as low as a few hundred thousand. It is commonly accepted however that iatrogenic disease (disease or injury brought on by a medical mistake or medical treatment) is the third leading cause of death in the United States after cardiovascular disease and cancer. See, The JOURNAL of the AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (JAMA) Vol 284, No 4, July 26th 2000.

As a lawyer who has limited his practice to representation of victims injured by somebody else's carelessness, medical or otherwise, I have actually gotten countless calls from potential customers over the last Twenty Years asking me if they have a medical malpractice case. Because medical malpractice litigation is very expensive and extremely drawn-out the lawyers in our company are extremely careful exactly what medical malpractice cases in which we decide to get involved. is not uncommon for a lawyer, or law practice to advance litigation costs in excess of $100,000.00 simply to get a case to trial. These expenses are the expenses related to pursuing the lawsuits that include skilled witness charges, deposition expenses, show preparation and court expenses. What follows is an outline of the issues, questions and factors to consider that the lawyers in our firm consider when discussing with a client a potential medical malpractice case.

What is Medical Malpractice?

Medical Malpractice is medical treatment that breaches of the "Standard of Care" for medical doctors (or nurses, chiropractic doctors, dental professionals, podiatric doctors etc.) which results in an injury or death. "Standard of Care" implies medical treatment that an affordable, prudent medical supplier in the exact same neighborhood ought to offer. Most cases involve a disagreement over what the suitable requirement of care is. The requirement of care is typically offered through the use of expert testimony from consulting physicians that practice or teach medicine in the same specialty as the offender( s).

When did the malpractice happen (Statute of Limitations)?

Rand Spear Law Office
Two Penn Center Plaza, 1500 John F Kennedy Blvd #200, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
+1 215-985-2424

In Ohio the medical malpractice statute of constraints is one year from the date of the malpractice, or the last date the offender treated the plaintiff (victim) or the date the complainant discovered or reasonably ought to have discovered the malpractice. Some states have a 2 year statute of limitations. In Ohio if the victim is a small the statute of limitations will not even start to run till the minor becomes 18 years of ages. Be advised nevertheless derivative claims for moms and dads may run many years earlier. If you believe you may have a case it is important you contact an attorney soon. Irrespective of the statute of constraints, physicians transfer, witnesses vanish and memories fade. The sooner counsel is engaged the sooner crucial evidence can be preserved and the better your opportunities are of prevailing.

What did the medical professional do or fail to do?

Merely because a client does not have a successful result from a surgical treatment, medical treatment or medical treatment does not in and of itself imply the medical professional slipped up. Medical practice is by no indicates an assurance of good health or a complete recovery. Most of the time when a patient experiences an unsuccessful arise from medical treatment it is not because the medical company made a mistake. The majority of the time when there is a bad medical outcome it is regardless of good, quality treatment not because of sub-standard healthcare.

Medical malpractice suit tops ‘Largest Verdicts’

A verdict handed down by a Fairfax jury in a medical malpractice suit tops the list in Virginia Lawyers Weekly’s compilation of “Largest Verdicts” for 2017. When a 55-year-old woman died from compl… Medical malpractice suit tops ‘Largest Verdicts’

When going over a potential case with a customer it is essential that the customer have the ability to tell us why they think there was medical negligence. As we all understand people frequently pass away from cancer, cardiovascular disease or organ failure even with good healthcare. Nevertheless, we also understand that people generally ought to not die from knee surgery, appendix elimination, hernia repair work or some other "minor" surgical treatment. When something very unexpected like that occurs it definitely is worth checking out whether there was a medical error. If in doubt most medical malpractice attorneys will discuss your case with you informally on the telephone. A lot of attorneys do not charge for a preliminary consultation in carelessness cases.

So what if there was a medical error (proximate cause)?

In any negligence case not only is the burden of proof on the plaintiff to prove the medical malpractice the plaintiff must also prove that as a direct result of the medical neglect some injury or death resulted (damages). This is called "near cause." Because medical malpractice litigation is so costly to pursue the injuries must be considerable to warrant moving forward with the case. All medical errors are "malpractice" however just a little percentage of errors generate medical malpractice cases.

By way of example, if a moms and dad takes his kid to the emergency room after a skateboard mishap and the ER physician does not do x-rays in spite of an obvious bend in the child's lower arm and informs the father his child has "simply a sprain" this most likely is medical malpractice. But, if the kid is appropriately diagnosed within a few days and makes a total healing it is not likely the "damages" are severe sufficient to undertake a claim that likely would cost in excess of $50,000.00. However, if because of the delay in being correctly detected, the kid needs to have his arm re-broken and the development plate is irreparably harmed due to the delay then the damages likely would call for more investigation and a possible claim.

Other important considerations.

Other problems that are necessary when determining whether a client has a malpractice case include the victim's behavior and medical history. Did the victim do anything to trigger or add to the bad medical result? A typical technique of medical malpractice defense attorneys is to blame the client. If it is a birth trauma case, did the mommy have correct prenatal care, did she smoke or use drugs throughout her pregnancy? In Get More , did the patient follow the doctor's orders, keep his appointments, take his medicine as instructed and inform the doctor the truth? These are facts that we have to understand in order to figure out whether the medical professional will have a legitimate defense to the malpractice suit?

What occurs if it appears like there is a case?

If it appears that the client might have been a victim of a medical error, the medical mistake caused a significant injury or death and the client was compliant with his physician's orders, then we need to get the patient's medical records. In most cases, obtaining the medical records involves absolutely nothing more mailing a release signed by the customer to the doctor and/or hospital in addition to a letter asking for the records. When it comes to wrongful death, an executor of the victims estate has to be selected in the regional county court of probate and then the executor can sign the release requesting the records.

As soon as the records are received we evaluate them to make sure they are total. It is not unusual in medical carelessness cases to receive insufficient medical charts. Once all the pertinent records are obtained they are provided to a competent medical specialist for review and opinion. If the case is against an emergency room physician we have an emergency room physician evaluate the case, if it protests a cardiologist we have to get a viewpoint from a cardiologist, and so on

. Mainly, exactly what we need to know form the professional is 1) was the treatment supplied below the standard of care, 2) did the infraction of the standard of care result in the clients injury or death? If the doctors viewpoint agrees with on both counts a lawsuit will be prepared on the customer's behalf and usually filed in the court of common pleas in the county where the malpractice was dedicated or in the county where the offender lives. In some limited scenarios jurisdiction for the malpractice lawsuit could be federal court or some other court.


In sum, a good malpractice attorney will carefully and completely examine any prospective malpractice case before submitting a claim. It's unfair to the victim or the doctors to submit a claim unless the professional informs us that he thinks there is a strong basis to bring the suit. Due to the expenditure of pursuing a medical neglect action no good legal representative has the time or resources to squander on a "frivolous lawsuit."

When consulting with a malpractice lawyer it's important to precisely provide the lawyer as much information as possible and address the attorney's questions as completely as possible. Prior to speaking with a legal representative consider making some notes so you don't forget some crucial reality or circumstance the lawyer may require.

Last but not least, if you believe you might have a malpractice case contact a good malpractice lawyer as soon as possible so there are no statute of restrictions problems in your case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *